A Strange Tale Of Jabberwockies, Evangelists, Icebergs And Physicists

One of the problems I have in critiquing Bumblin' Bobby's prattle, is that he is so bleedin' repetitive. I've spoken myself, in the past, of the value of a certain amount of repetition, but I do like to have some variety in my own posts; which is damned hard to achieve, when faced with the same old arguments, over and over again.

But I shall try, Gentle Reader, I shall try…

Oh, and by the way Bob, you're barred, as I told you some time back, from commenting at my main blog, but free to speak here. I mention this because you appear somewhat confused on the topic.

This is a two-in-one, Parte, Ye Firste being in reply to this load of old tosh.

What, asks the Pious Plagiarist Pamphleteer Plonker, is the common theme between these events?

1. The sinking of the Titanic – 1912
2. The attack on Pearl Harbour – 1941
3. The bombing of the King David Hotel – 1946
4. The death of Georgie Best – 2005

Umm… Continue reading


In Which Bob Takes A Look At Those New-Fangled Talking Picture-Shows

Bob thinks that, 'The devil uses the film industry to spread his lies.'

I note from the national press that the film "Ouija", which is being shown on cinemas at the moment, is leading to a huge increase in people dabbling in the occult.

Hmm. Given the timing and Bob's known obsession with the site, I rather think he actually got this from The Freethinker but doesn't want to mention it as a source. I could be wrong, but it is rather notable that he generally doesn't like to name atheist sites and blogs, even when talking of them directly.

This will, in turn, lead to a corresponding increase in people being taken over by demonic forces and suffering all sorts of mental and physical troubles in their lives. Continue reading

In Which Bob Enthuses Over A Website Of Dubious Value

I've missed a few, but here's a quick reply to Bob's latest offering.

Bob sez:

Over the last 10 years, or so, I've sought many opportunities to engage in reasoned debate with non-Christians on the internet. Although there have been some people with a willingness to discuss various issues in a reasonable way, there have also been many occasions when I've had to stop such debates because the unbeliever has showed a distinct hostility to having a sensible discussion.

I just checked, and no, I didn't copy-paste from the wrong blog. This is, indeed, Bob the Broadstairs Balderdasher speaking of 'reasoned debate' and 'sensible discussion.' And yet here I write on a blog which owes its very existence to the fact that Blathering Bob wouldn't know either if they bit him on the very same arse he argues from.

Such people are not interested in searching for truth, all they want to do is pour out invective against God and the Bible; to attempt to reason with them is a classic case of "pearls before swine" – Matthew 7 v 6.

Au contraire, Bob. 'Such people' tend to be very interested in the truth. They merely disagree as to the amount of truth contained in your Bible. Oddly enough, they/we don't happen to see your assertions, unsupported by evidence as they are, that the Bible is literal truth from cover to cover as, well… anything but assertions unsupported by evidence.

Also, I have to wonder Bob. Do you have a hotkey assigned to '"pearls before swine" – Matthew 7 v 6'? If not, you really should have. It'd probably save you hours of typing over the course of a year, what with you seemingly typing the damn phrase out every ten minutes or so. Still, I suppose, having found a Biblically-allowed schoolyard insult, you're probably a bit loathe to give it up.

(Indeed, some of these people have been so angry against the Bible they have even banned me from their blogs, no doubt because they cannot cope with the power of God's word).

Umm. No. Speaking from experience, The Bouncing Bob is banned from many blogs for being an insufferable boor who will neither shut up nor say anything original or interesting. Oh, and a self-admitted user of sockpuppetry. And a plagiarist. And a hypocrite. You get the idea. The bloke's a cad of the first water.

Moreover, when passing out tracts on the street I've become adept as discerning the difference between a genuine seeker and those who just want to have an argument.

Let me guess… the former don't ask inconvenient questions, or point out bits of the Bible where God acts a bit nasty, whereas the latter do.

When meeting genuine seekers I often point them to an excellent web site which seeks to answer people's sincere questions and exposes the errors of false teaching eg evolution, atheism and the cults. This web site I write on the back of a booklet entitled "Knowing God personally" which I give to people who show any kind of interest in the truths of the Gospel.

Ah, the very definition of humble faith. Humdrum Hutton knows the creator of the entire freakin' universe. Personally, no less. Probably pops round for tea and scones dontcha know. And people like him say atheists are egotistical?

The address of it is: www.thechristiananswer.org [Bloody hell! Bob added a link! Be still, my gaping jaw.] and it is well worth a Christian studying it in order to strengthen one's faith and give ready answers to genuine enquirers. The Bible says that we need to be ready to give an answer to those who ask about the faith we have (1st Peter 3 v 15).

I've had a look and, well, let's just say it makes Answers In Genesis look intellectual. I can see why Bob likes it though. Lots of unsupported assertions of fact, strawmanning and suchlike fuckwittery. Nowhere does it address the central problem with religion—that there's no actual evidence that a god even exists. It does address the central problem with Biblical literalism—that evidence-based enquiry shows such a viewpoint to be flatly wrong—but it does so, in patronisingly simplistic language, by pretending that either the evidence doesn't exist, or that the Bible is better evidence.

In short, it's a pile of that stuff you usually find just to the south of a well-fed bull. I might, if the whim takes me, take a closer gander at it and take the piss out of critique some of the more amusing interesting bits on my regular blog.

This web site is an invaluable aid to evangelists and, indeed, to any Christian with a desire to spread the word so that others can be saved. As we do so let us remember that if a person is truly, and sincerely, seeking after God then they will find Him.

Whereas if a person is truly, sincerely and honestly weighing up the evidence for and against, they're merely looking for an argument, Bob?

"You will seek me and find me, when you search for me with all your heart" Jeremiah 29 v 13

"If you're convinced it's possible for invisible friends to truly exist, you'll have no trouble convincing yourself you have one of your very own."
Daz 3.14159 v 227

You may use these HTML tags in comments
<a href="" title=""></a> <abbr title=""></abbr>
<acronym title=""></acronym> <blockquote></blockquote> <del></del>* <strike></strike>† <em></em>* <i></i>† <strong></strong>* <b></b>†

* is generally preferred over †

Atheists, Please Dispose Of Chick Tracts In The Approved Manner

Bob's unhappy that someone he foisted a tract upon dropped it in disgust and walked off. Diddums.

If in the street, you're given a tract,
You have the choice to give it back
Or throw it in a rubbish-bin
Or roll it up with ganja in
Or hang it on the toilet wall
For use when nature makes a call
Or make an origami crane
Or a paper aeroplane
Or wedge a wobbly kitchen table
Or laugh at it, if you are able;
But throw it to the ground? Please, no!
Littering is wrong, you know.


Continue reading

In Which We Find That Bob Is No Ian Paisley

You can't get to heaven in an old Ford Prefect,
But not 'cause the car's got a fault or a defect.
You can't get to heaven in a baked bean tin,
But not 'cause the tin's got baked beans in.
And you'll never roll to hell in a tractor-tyre,
But not 'cause the tyre gets stuck in the mire.
You'll never lose your soul in a gambling game,
But not 'cause winning wards off the flame.

This doggerel is horrible so here's an end,
And a reason my rhymes took a negative trend.
You'll never do the things I mention in that list
'cause souls and afterlives don't exist!

Ordinarily, Gentle Reader, I would not have unleashed the above mess upon your eyes. You are a refined, gentle, and cultured person (I know you are!) and do not deserve such ocular torture. Continue reading


It's time, once again, to address Bob Hutton's internet-ravings. Reading through his latest, it quickly becomes apparent that Bob's not a student of logic. Nor is he particularly adept at making clear, concise points. The whole post is a mess of half-expressed ideas, paradoxes and misreadings or misrepresentations of his source material; the Bible. And none of it, once you pick out the various strands is new. In fact it's not even new to this blog or to my main blog, where all of the points discussed have been dissected before.

Still an' all, let's go through it and see if some rewording n my own part might finally convince Bob that there's an objection or two he needs to address with more than a hand-waving reference to a Bible-verse. (I'd say I'd like to convince the chap he's wrong about something, but let's not set our goals too high, eh?) Continue reading